Your content.More reach.Deeper insight.
The depth of reporting a practice platform can offer is limited by the depth of metadata behind its items. Jai brings that depth to your content — so your items power adaptive practice, specific feedback, and reporting that actually tells you something.
High-quality metadatais what makesinsightful reportingpossible.
Most item banks can tell you whether someone got a question right or wrong. That's it. No richer reporting is possible because there isn't enough information attached to each item to support it.
The reason ForMe can tell a practiser “you have a gap in algebraic manipulation, concentrated in multi-step equations” — rather than just “you got 68% in maths” — isn't clever UI. It's the depth of metadata attached to every item. And that's where Jai comes in.
Rich metadata is the foundation of everything worth reporting. Mastery tracking, gap analysis, readiness signals, specific feedback, honest progress — none of it is possible without it.
Enrich what you already have
Most item banks carry the metadata the original test needed — not the depth a modern practice platform requires. Jai analyses your existing items and enriches them with skill tags, syllabus mapping, difficulty calibration, misconception identification, and the other layers that power genuine adaptivity and insight. No authoring required. No rewriting required.
Reporting that actually tells you something
Every item in ForMe builds a performance profile as practisers engage with it. Cross-referenced with the metadata Jai adds, that data turns into actionable insight — which items are performing well, which may need revision, which skills consistently confound, and where your content has gaps. It’s a refinement engine for your content library, not just a distribution channel.
A new channel for existing content
Alongside the analytical value, your items reach practisers through an adaptive platform with a modern practice experience — on phone, tablet, with audio and voice. That delivery layer is built and maintained by us, so you don’t have to.
Three layers.One integrated platform.
ForMe is built in layers, so partners can engage at whichever level makes sense for them. Each layer adds value on top of the one below.
The surface-level product — adaptive sessions, progress dashboards, the interface your practisers use. You get a modern, mobile-first practice experience without building it yourself.
The analysis layer that sits underneath. Jai deeply understands every question — what it tests, where it maps, what misconceptions it catches — and powers the platform’s adaptivity, feedback, and reporting.
For partners who want to grow or refresh their item bank, Jai supports authoring new items at a scale and quality that’s historically been out of reach — with governance, traceability, and subject matter expert review built into the workflow.
Create at a scalegovernance usuallycan't keep up with.
Many partnerships stay at the enrichment layer — which is where most of the practiser-facing value lives. But for partners who want to grow or refresh their item bank, Jai's authoring capability is there.
Most assessment organisations face the same tension: item demand keeps growing, timelines keep shrinking, but quality and defensibility can't be compromised. Manual authoring is slow and expensive. Unmanaged AI authoring is fast but untraceable and inconsistent. Jai solves the tension — when and if you decide to use it.
Volume without losing quality
Jai generates items grounded in your curriculum, your rubrics, your exemplars — not generic content. Every item is produced against your explicit definitions of quality, so scale doesn’t mean a quality drop.
Governance by design
Every generated item is fully traceable back to its source material and the reasoning behind it. AI doesn’t retain anything. Items are returned for expert review. Audit trails, version control, and review workflows are built into the platform — not bolted on.
Consistency across authors, cohorts, and time
Institutional standards become explicit and durable — not dependent on which author writes which item on which day. The same quality bar is applied across everything, so your item bank holds its shape as it scales.
If authoring at scale has felt unachievable without compromising quality or governance, Jai is what changes that. Every item is produced against your explicit standards, reviewed by your experts, and fully traceable — whether you're making ten items or ten thousand.
Everything you need to turncontent into a livepractice product.
Modern practice UX
Mobile-first, adaptive, multi-modal — on phone, tablet, with audio and voice. The kind of experience practisers expect in 2026, built and maintained by us.
Rich metadata enrichment
Jai analyses and enriches every item with the metadata needed for adaptive sessions, specific feedback, and honest progress signals.
Adaptive session logic
The engine that decides what question to serve next, based on each practiser’s performance, gaps, and goals. Proven, tuned, and always improving.
Progress and mastery reporting
What practisers see. What parents see. What organisations see. Reporting designed for real decisions, not just activity metrics.
Item performance analytics
Insight into how your items are performing in practice — what’s working, what needs revision, and where gaps exist. A refinement engine, not just a distribution channel.
Authoring at scale with governance
Generate new items against your curriculum, your rubrics, your standards — with full traceability, expert review, and audit trails built in. Scale without losing control.
There's no one shapefor a content partnership.
Every partner has different content, different audiences, and different goals. ForMe supports a range of partnership shapes — from content contributions that sit alongside other streams, to partner-branded streams with their own identity, to pilots that test an approach before committing. The right shape for your organisation is a conversation, not a template.
Items feed into ForMe-delivered streams, with enrichment, reporting, and performance feedback flowing back to the partner.
A practice stream carrying the partner's identity, built on ForMe's infrastructure.
Time-bounded partnerships to test content performance, audience response, or integration approach before committing to a longer arrangement.
Ongoing relationships where content evolves and expands over time, supported by item performance data and operator intelligence.
Why Jai mattersfor partners.
Most practice platforms work at the level of “question and score.” Jai works at a deeper level — and that depth is what changes what a practice platform can actually do for you and your practisers.
Understanding every question
Jai analyses each item to build a structured understanding of what skill it tests, where it maps in the curriculum or syllabus, and what misconceptions might lie behind incorrect answers. That understanding is what lets the platform tell a practiser why they got something wrong, not just that they did.
Measuring skill, not memorisation
Depth of analysis at scale means practisers can be assessed on their genuine understanding of a concept — across multiple questions, multiple angles, multiple difficulty levels. It’s the difference between testing “have you seen this before” and testing “do you actually understand this.”
Continuous improvement, backed by data
As practisers engage with items over time, Jai surfaces patterns — items that over-perform or under-perform, skills that consistently confound, content gaps that your next release could fill. Your item bank gets smarter, and so does ForMe’s ability to teach with it.
Built by an organisationthat has been inassessment for over25 years.
ForMe is built by Janison — one of the largest assessment technology organisations in the Asia-Pacific region. We run national-scale assessments, power large-scale testing programs, and deliver ICAS, the biggest academic competition in the region.
We've worked with government bodies, exam authorities, universities, and global education publishers for more than two decades. ForMe is the product of that experience — a practice platform designed from the inside out, by people who have lived the realities of delivering assessments at scale.
Common questionsfrom partners.
You can bring your own content — most partnerships start there, and Jai's role is to analyse and enrich your existing items. Jai can also author new items at scale when you want to grow or refresh your bank, fully governed and reviewed by your experts. Both are available; neither is a prerequisite.
Your content remains yours. Partnership arrangements include clear terms on IP ownership, usage rights, and data handling. That's part of the commercial conversation, not something we prescribe.
Revenue models vary by partnership shape — revenue share, licensing, or other structures depending on what makes sense for the content, the audience, and the partnership scope. We'd discuss this as part of a conversation about what you're trying to achieve.
It depends on the partnership shape. A content contribution pilot with an existing item format can move quickly. A full partner-branded stream with deeper integration takes longer. We'd give you a clearer picture in a demo conversation.
Yes. Pilot engagements are a common and recommended way to start — they let both sides test content performance, audience response, and fit before a longer arrangement.
Multiple-choice, extended matching, written response, numeric, and adaptive formats across most subject areas. If you're unsure whether your content fits, a demo conversation is the fastest way to find out.
Let's talk aboutwhat your contentcould do.
The best way to understand the fit is a conversation. We'll walk you through the platform, show you how Jai works on a sample of your content, and discuss partnership models that might suit you.
FOR ORGANISATIONS THAT PREFER WRITTEN ENQUIRY